Taylor Swift's Legal Team Once Again Proved That Picking A Lawsuit Against The Artist Isn't Always T
Taylor Swift is one in all the greatest, most popular singers at the moment. With a profession spanning over a decade, her profession is doing higher than ever. With the Eras Tour, Swift is making more than $Thirteen million a evening in price tag sales by myself, no marvel she’s expected to ship the highest-grossing excursion in tune history!
Over the years, Taylor Swift has been the topic of many controversies. For instance, in 2019, she had a public feud with her then-manager Scooter Braun, and closing summer time, she turned into called out for her excessive non-public jet utilization. Most recently, the singer changed into sued through a Mississippi writer claiming that the singer had stole details of a 2010 poetry book and used them for her Lover e-book.
Taylor Swift Has Been Accused Of Plagiarism Several Times In The Past
Way ahead of the “Lover” e-book debacle, Taylor Swift was sued for plagiarizing the lyrics of one of her most iconic songs. In 2017, a pair of songwriters who penned 3LW's "Playas Gon' Play," filed a lawsuit against Swift, claiming that her 2013 unmarried “Shake It Off” copied the lyrics in their 2001 track, which featured the traces "playas, they gonna play" and "haters, they gonna hate."
Swift had to face a jury trial regardless of her requests to dismiss the case. “The lyrics to ‘Shake It Off’ had been written entirely by me,” the “Bad Blood” singer stated. “Until learning about Plaintiffs’ claim in 2017, I had never heard the music ‘Playas Gon’ Play and had by no means heard of that music or the crew 3LW’. The first time I ever heard the track become after this claim was made.”
Ultimately, the ‘Shake It Off’ copyright lawsuit was dropped on December 2022.
In 2020, small industry owner Amira Rasool accused Swift of copying her business’ logo for the products related with her album Folklore. "I am not going to let this blatant theft go unchecked," Rasool claimed on social media.
"Yesterday, we were made aware of a complaint that the specific use of the word 'the' before 'folklore album' on some of the folklore album merchandise was of concern," a observation from Swift’s reps stated. "In good faith, we honored her request and immediately notified everyone who had ordered merchandise with the word 'the' preceding 'folklore album' that they will now receive their order with the design change."
Ultimately, Rasool applauded the singer’s team for his or her fast reaction claiming, “I acknowledge that she has been a sturdy recommend for ladies protecting their inventive rights, so it become just right to see her team is on the same page."
A Little-Known Author Accused Taylor Swift Of Stealing The Lover Book Design
Last summer, a Mississippi poet and author named Teresa La Dart filed a copyright lawsuit against Taylor Swift. The author claimed that the singer had stolen design details from her 2010 poetry book, titled Lover, and had used them for the book accompanying Swift’s album of the same name. Since Swift’s book infringed La Dart’s copyrights, the author’s lawyers were claiming an “excess of one million dollars” in damages.
The alleged similarities between La Dart’s and Swift’s books include covers that feature “pastel pinks and blues,” as well as an image of the author “photographed in a downward pose.” La Dart also claims Swift copied her book’s “format,” both being “a recollection of past years memorialized in a combination of written and pictorial components.” Swift’s book consisted of a total of 120 pages with personal diary entries and photos.
In their response, Swift’s lawyers said those elements were nothing more than commonplace features that could be found in almost any book, so they weren’t unique enough to qualify for copyright protection. “These allegedly-infringing elements, each a generic design format, are not subject to copyright protection. Thus, defendants could not possibly have infringed the plaintiff’s copyright.”
While the titles of Swift’s book and La Dart’s book are identical, this seems to be the only concrete similarity between their books. But this is not enough to win a copyright case, as copyright law typically doesn’t protect titles. In fact, the U.S. Copyright Office records indicate that there are currently more than a dozen other books with the same title.
The Copyright Lawsuit Against Taylor Swift’s Lover Book Was Dropped
Last month, Teresa La Dar dropped her copyright lawsuit against Taylor Swift, claiming that the singer had stolen ideas from her 2010 poetry book for her “Lover” album companion book. Swift’s lawyers said that the case was “legally and factually baseless” and “never should have been filed” in the first place.
Swift’s legal professionals had filed a movement to dismiss the case when La Dart all of sudden dropped the case. The dismissal of the lawsuit was completely voluntary and unilateral on La Dar’s phase. Faced with robust counterarguments from Swift’s lawyers, it made sense for La Dar to take this course of action. If she had selected to continue the litigations, likelihood is that she would have misplaced the case, even having to pay off the singer’s legal charges, which can have cost her tens of thousands of greenbacks.
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTErZ%2Bippeoe6S7zGirmrGcpL9uv9aina1lp5bAbr%2FUnptmnp%2BnerTAxJqjoqaXYsGpsYylpq%2BdomKvsLvKZpueq5mcu3A%3D